As companies expand their digital ecosystems with APIs at the core, managing these interfaces with flexibility and governance has become essential. Traditional centralised API management models struggle to keep pace with decentralised, microservices-based environments. To address this challenge, federated API management provides a scalable solution, allowing API management to be distributed across teams while still following overarching governance principles.
Christian Posta’s recent report on Omni-Directional API Management for Platform Engineering offers a strong foundation for federated API management in platform engineering teams. His insights demonstrate how federated API management, when combined with modern tools like Gloo Gateway and Istio, empowers teams with decentralised self-service and omni-directional traffic management. This approach balances developer autonomy with platform governance, covering all traffic types—ingress, east-west, and egress. In my recent apidays London talk, I expanded on this concept by presenting a specification framework for API management federation, which focuses on standardisation and consistent governance across teams and environments. This blog explores how Posta’s approach and my specification framework align to offer a complete model for organisations seeking flexible, resilient API management.
The Case for Federated API Management
In modern cloud-native architectures, centralised API management often becomes a bottleneck, limiting teams’ ability to manage their services autonomously. Federated API management addresses this need by providing a model where teams can independently configure and deploy APIs. Christian Posta’s report emphasises a flexible, omni-directional approach that allows traffic to flow across ingress, east-west, and egress directions. This design is particularly relevant for platform engineering teams, as it ensures seamless and secure API communication across all parts of an organisation’s infrastructure, allowing each team to manage their configurations without dependency on a centralised team.
Posta’s focus on platform engineering underscores the importance of self-service and tenancy in federated API management. His report showcases how decentralised gateways allow developers to manage their API gateways autonomously while the platform team enforces broad governance standards. This self-service model reduces bottlenecks and accelerates API delivery by allowing teams to manage their microgateways according to specific needs, all while maintaining security and compliance.
Moreover, Posta’s approach integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows by emphasising declarative, GitOps-driven configuration. This approach aligns well with continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD), providing an automation-ready environment where API policies and configurations are managed as code. This practical implementation, powered by cloud-native tools like Istio and Gloo Gateway, demonstrates the scalability of federated API management, particularly for organisations operating in complex, multi-cloud, or hybrid environments.
Where a Specification Framework Fits
A specification framework complements federated API management by creating standard policies that ensure consistency and governance across distributed teams and microgateways. While Posta’s report focuses on technology-specific implementation, a specification framework is tool-agnostic and defines a structured set of guidelines that unify how gateways across the organisation handle key tasks such as security, routing, and observability.
This framework codifies essential standards—like security protocols (e.g., mTLS or JWT handling) and traffic management practices—so teams have a reliable foundation for their API configurations, regardless of the technology stack they use. For example, it might establish uniform practices for API authentication or specify templates for onboarding new APIs, all designed to work within a federated system. Such a framework helps maintain a unified security and governance model across all API environments, allowing teams to innovate within a controlled and compliant structure.
Standardisation also supports seamless traffic management across all API interactions—whether external (ingress), internal (east-west), or egress. By providing guidelines for load balancing, fault tolerance, and API versioning, the framework helps mitigate issues like misrouted requests or bottlenecks. This standardisation is especially valuable in federated environments, where decentralised teams manage APIs independently. With clear templates and practices, teams can configure APIs efficiently while adhering to consistent governance.
Synergies between Posta’s Report and the Specification Framework
Both Christian Posta’s report and the specification framework aim to create a federated API management system that balances team autonomy with governance. The report’s emphasis on practical tools and flexible implementation complements the high-level, governance-focused approach of a specification framework. Together, they enable a holistic API strategy that fosters agility without compromising on security and compliance.
Both approaches align on the importance of self-service in federated API environments. Posta’s report details how teams can manage their API gateways autonomously, while the specification framework enhances this with standardised templates that simplify the setup and management of APIs. The result is a developer-friendly environment where autonomy and governance work in harmony.
They also share a focus on managing omni-directional traffic. Posta’s report details a federated model that places API control near the services it manages, a strategy that the specification framework supports by outlining standardised policies across ingress, east-west, and egress traffic. By defining policies for routing, security, and observability, the framework ensures these controls are applied consistently across diverse tools and gateways.
Additionally, both approaches emphasise declarative configuration, allowing API policies and configurations to be managed as code. Posta’s GitOps-enabled, declarative workflows streamline automation and reduce deployment friction, while the specification framework extends these practices with policies that apply uniformly across federated environments. This shared focus on codified practices helps maintain reliable, repeatable processes within a federated API system.
Key Differences to Address
Despite these synergies, there are notable differences in focus. Posta’s report emphasises flexibility and adaptability, supporting team-specific gateway configurations that allow for rapid iteration and tailored solutions. However, this model might result in inconsistent practices across gateways, making a specification framework’s centralised policies essential for environments requiring high governance.
The specification framework’s governance-first approach provides robust, consistent policies but may reduce flexibility for teams. This approach is particularly valuable in sectors with strict compliance requirements, as it enforces standardised practices across all API gateways. While it may introduce more procedural steps, it ensures a unified approach to security and operational management.
Additionally, Posta’s report is rooted in specific cloud-native technologies (Gloo Gateway, Istio), which enhance scalability and control. In contrast, a specification framework remains tool-agnostic, allowing teams to adopt various solutions that best fit their environment. This technology independence strengthens the framework’s applicability across different tech stacks, though it may sacrifice some efficiencies provided by specialised tools.
Conclusion
Federated API management has become essential in modern, cloud-native architectures. Christian Posta’s report presents a practical, technology-driven approach to decentralised API management, emphasising flexibility and developer autonomy. This model is well-suited to organisations aiming to scale quickly and adapt to evolving requirements. At the same time, a specification framework brings consistency and oversight, supporting governance in a federated system with tool-agnostic standards that ensure security, compliance, and operational consistency.
By combining the implementation insights from Posta’s report with the structured governance provided by a specification framework, organisations can build a federated API ecosystem that balances agility with security. This dual approach is ideal for modern enterprises seeking both flexibility and control in their API strategy.
As I prepare to present an updated version of the specification framework talk at apidays Paris, I look forward to further exploring how these complementary strategies can empower organisations to manage APIs efficiently and securely in an increasingly complex digital landscape.
References:
Christian Posta's LinkedIn Post about the covered Report
Charge your APIs Volume 22: Mastering the Art of API Federation
Charge your APIs Volume 24: Harmonizing API Strategy and Team Dynamics
Was this post helpful?
More articles
fromDaniel Kocot
21.8.2024 Your job at codecentric?
Jobs
Agile Developer und Consultant (w/d/m)
Alle Standorte
More articles in this subject area
Discover exciting further topics and let the codecentric world inspire you.
Gemeinsam bessere Projekte umsetzen.
Wir helfen deinem Unternehmen.
Du stehst vor einer großen IT-Herausforderung? Wir sorgen für eine maßgeschneiderte Unterstützung. Informiere dich jetzt.
Hilf uns, noch besser zu werden.
Wir sind immer auf der Suche nach neuen Talenten. Auch für dich ist die passende Stelle dabei.
Blog author
Daniel Kocot
Senior Solution Architect / Head of API Consulting
Do you still have questions? Just send me a message.
Do you still have questions? Just send me a message.